Former President Donald Trump’s return to the White House marked a clear intention to implement significant tariff changes, despite no immediate action on his first day. While his initial activities focused on executive orders, Trump’s statements strongly indicated the arrival of historic new duties on imports.
Table Content:
Trump explicitly stated his intention to impose a 25% tariff on goods from Mexico and Canada, potentially as early as February 1st. He suggested that these tariffs could be implemented soon. He also hinted at the possibility of broader tariffs targeting all countries, claiming widespread unfair trade practices against the United States.
While details on new tariffs against China remained undisclosed, Trump indicated ongoing negotiations and meetings. However, he emphasized the potential for tariffs even amidst discussions regarding the social media platform TikTok and its Chinese parent company, ByteDance. He suggested tariffs on China as a possible response if a TikTok divestiture deal wasn’t approved by China.
Trump’s Tariff History and Initial Market Reactions
During his presidential campaign and following his victory, Trump consistently advocated for substantial tariffs, proposing rates as high as 60% on Chinese goods and up to 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada.
On his first day back, Trump signed an executive order to establish an “America First Trade Policy,” directing a review of unfair trade practices and recommendations for remedial actions. This initial delay in enacting tariffs might have been intended to mitigate market volatility. However, experts warned that significant trade actions were still likely.
Market reactions to Trump’s initial moves were mixed. While U.S. stock markets were closed, S&P 500 futures showed an initial rise. The U.S. dollar index, after dropping from a near two-year high on signs of tariff delays, surged again following Trump’s comments.
Potential Legal Frameworks for Tariff Implementation
Despite the initial delay, Trump’s inaugural address reinforced his commitment to overhauling the U.S. trade system through tariffs to protect American workers and families. While some analysts, like Jon Hilsenrath of Serpa Pinto Advisory, initially viewed the delay as a positive sign for markets, experts cautioned that this could be short-lived.
Trump’s potential legal avenues for enacting tariffs include the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law granting the president broad authority during national emergencies. This controversial option, while potentially facing legal challenges, allows for swift and aggressive action. Alternatively, Trump could utilize Section 301 and Section 232 tariffs, more legally established routes that might require a slower and less aggressive approach.
Experts Predict Future Trade Conflicts and Market Volatility
Experts, such as Ian Bremmer of Eurasia Group, predicted upcoming trade conflicts, particularly with China. While deals with other countries might be possible, a trade war with China over the next four years seemed increasingly likely. Andrew D. Bishop of Signum Global expressed skepticism about a “Phase 2” trade deal with China, echoing the sentiment that significant trade disputes remain unresolved.
Capitol Economics analysts anticipated continued market volatility despite the initial calm, predicting a further rally in the U.S. dollar and equities during Trump’s first year back in office. Trump himself emphasized the potential for increased Treasury revenue due to anticipated high tariffs.
Despite the initial inaction, Trump’s return to the White House signaled a strong commitment to implementing significant tariff changes, setting the stage for potential trade conflicts and continued market uncertainty. His statements and past actions point to a future where tariffs play a central role in his economic agenda.
